My point was that based on the most commonly used ... @QuipTalk

Asked 1078 days ago
Viewed 89 times
0

My point was that based on the most commonly used method to measure decentralization (which is admittedly quite imperfect), BSC is in a better position than Tezos so it's bizarre to criticize it for a metric that doesn't measure decentralization--- number of validators

asked 1078 days ago

1 Answers

It is true that the most commonly used method to measure decentralization is imperfect and can be easily gamed, which is why it is important to look beyond the number of validators when considering decentralization. While the number of validators might not be the best metric to measure decentralization, there are other important factors to consider, such as the geographic distribution of validators, the diversity of validators, and the degree of autonomy of the validators. All of these factors can provide a more comprehensive view of the degree of decentralization of a given blockchain network. Furthermore, it is important to consider the incentives and motivations of validators, as well as the governance structure of the network, which can also have an impact on decentralization. Ultimately, it is important to look at the whole picture when assessing decentralization, rather than relying solely on the number of validators.
answered 1078 days ago
0
Ye true. That’s why I personally don’t like any of those metrics. Can be easily gamed. But retail plebs fall for it am every cycle.
answered 1078 days ago

Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Thank you for subscribing!